Padres broadcast issues show changing nature of live sports on television

When Diamond Sports Group, known for its Bally regional sports networks, failed to make its most recent payment to the San Diego Padres this week, a snowball started rolling downhill.

The broadcast rights for San Diego's games reverted back to the Padres, Major League Baseball took over production of Padres games and the loud bell that some heard ringing was the death knell of the regional sports network as we have come to know them.

While Padres games are still available through cable or other outlets, it is well known that MLB would like to put all 30 of its teams on some kind of umbrella streaming service. If orange is the new black and 50 is the new 40, streaming services would like to be the new cable. The live sports that once came into your living room for free through the air and later poured out of your television screen with a monthly cable bill are slowly working their way onto streaming platforms for subscription fees.

While an all-encompassing streaming network for MLB might be a long road, such a move would be just another step in the trend of major sports starting to hide some of its products behind the paywalls of streaming services. Cable's great advantage over streaming has been live sports, with even some teams having their own network. That advantage might be slipping away.

More:MLB takes over San Diego Padres broadcasts after Bally misses payment

Impossible, you say? Remember that events that seemed like they would stay on the networks forever — think about events like the Rose Bowl — moved to cable decades ago. Could such events find their way to streaming services as cable continues to slide and sports look for new or additional revenue sources?

Consider for a moment:

None of this means the Super Bowl will be an exclusive property of Paramount+ or Peacock anytime soon – at least for now – but it does all point toward a world where team and league control of broadcasts on streaming services is potentially the next evolution for live sports. The NFL, as usual, seems to be ahead of the game.

You can imagine a world where the PGA Tour has its own streaming service, providing on-demand coverage of its events from the regular tour to PGA Tour Champions to the Korn Ferry Tour. Maybe that would be the way for the LPGA to promote its tour perhaps better than it is treated by other broadcast outlets.

While cord-cutting is eating away at cable's relevance, streaming services have their own issues. Some, like CNN+, shut down almost before they debuted. All of them cost money, of course, and some offer far more than a viewer actually wants, much like cable. Disney Plus, for instance, can offer Hulu and ESPN+. Do Mickey Mouse and the PGA Tour attract the same audiences? Chase all the live sports heading to streaming, and suddenly the costs of multiple streaming services begin to approach the cost of cable.

One thing seems certain. More and more live sports will be heading to streaming services in the coming months and years, and complaints from fans about having to subscribe to watch will follow. If you don't think some major events will head to streaming, just remember when every college bowl game was on a major network, and how all those games moved to cable. The Rose Bowl on Peacock can't be too many years away.

Larry Bohannan is the golf writer for The Desert Sun. You can contact him at (760) 778-4633 or at [email protected]. Follow him on Facebook or on Twitter at @larry_bohannan. Support local journalism. Subscribe to The Desert Sun.